Finding the Path
An Interview with Diana Pharaoh Francis
By Russ Gifford
Copyright © 2007 by Russ Gifford, All Rights Reserved
Diana
Pharaoh Francis has written fantastically detailed and wonderfully
realistic fantasy novels including Path of Fate, Path of Honor
and Path of Blood. Path of Fate was nominated for the Mary
Roberts Rinehart Award. Her next book, The Cipher, the first of
The Crosspointe Chronicles, will be available in November 2007.
We reached Ms. Francis in Montana,
where she teaches in the English Department at the University of Montana
Western. She has graciously shared her time, and her thoughts.
Be sure to visit her website for more
information:
www.dianapfrancis.com!
Vision:
What was the first book that you wrote? Did it look anything like your
first published novel? Did you start with novels or short stories?
This first novel I wrote was a
romance novel. At the time, my roommate was a romance fanatic and
owned probably well over five or six thousand romance novels stacked
three and four deep on her floor-to-ceiling bookshelves besieging
her room. It was like having my own personal library. So I read a
lot of them and started writing it. I wrote it mostly on my lunch
hour while working doing paste-up and layout for a newspaper, and I
wrote it entirely by hand. I’d drive from work to Taco Bell, buy a
diet coke, and eat my lunch while scribbling. It sits in the trunk
still (or rather, bottom of the file cabinet.) It takes up four
spiral notebooks. I haven’t read it in at least fifteen years, and
I confess I’m a little afraid to—and probably couldn’t read my
chicken scratch if I wanted to. And as far as I remember, it in no
way resembles my first published novel, Path of Fate, except that it
has a beginning, an end, and is probably close to as long.
I started out writing short
stories, because that was what was assigned in my college creative
writing courses. That was the first time it actually occurred to me
that I could actually write down the stories I’d been telling myself
for years. I started my first novel in graduate school, though I
never finished it. It was a crossover sf/f and it had a cast of way
too many. I couldn’t juggle them all. And it was a little shallow
and silly. Then when I started my PhD program, I had another idea
and was working on it at the same time I was writing my
dissertation. I’d switch back and forth whenever I got stuck on one
or the other. It still sits in the trunk too.
Vision:
You currently have two ongoing series – The Path series, and the
Crosspointe series. Both beautifully done, with realistic characters and
vividly painted scenes. (I occasionally feel the wind nipping at my hair
when I read one of your outdoor descriptions!) Did you start your
stories with the characters, or the plot? Did these start as a series,
or was that a result of finishing the stories and realizing there were
other places for these people to go, other situations to explore?
Thank you for that compliment. I
really appreciate it. Actually the Path books are a trilogy—all wrapped
up and done. The Crosspointe books will hopefully be an ongoing series,
though each stands alone with different characters in each book.
But to answer your
question . . . . The Path books started out as just a single book. I
had this character in mind who was afraid of heights and who was forced
to go flying (or have the impression of it) and ended up puking. And I
had this question about what kind of people sacrifice themselves for
total strangers? The rest of the story seemed to grow up around those
two ideas and came from the things around me at the time. For instance,
a friend does research on goshawks, so I was able to go out into the
field with him and experience them, plus ask him a whole lot of
questions. It wasn’t until later that the books turned into a trilogy.
That came about because after I was done with Path of Fate, the question
of “Whatever became of Mysane Kosk?” kept bothering me. I mean, the
equivalent of a magical nuclear bomb was dropped. Surely it had to have
more effect? So I started plotting out the next two novels, and then
went back to Path of Fate and added in some foreshadowing.
For the Crosspointe books, I had been
taking notes on little scraps of stories that didn’t seem to have
anything in common. Then one day, it occurred to me that they could fit
together into an actual story. I began with figuring out the world.
Then I started wondering who lived there. Actually, the first book
focuses on Lucy, a customs official, but she wasn’t one of the first
characters I thought of. I shelved about three other stories and
focused on her. The why of that is mostly that her story suddenly
grabbed me and the others were still gestating. Still are.
Vision:
Where are these series going now? What are your hopes / intentions with
these? Do you see yourself continuing them, or did you plan them as
trilogies and then move on? If they are planned as trilogies, how did
you avoid that 'middle book' syndrome – the 'this is just a vehicle to
get us from Book 1 to Book 3' feeling older trilogies used to exhibit –
because that is certainly not present in your situation!
Well, as I said, the Path books are a
trilogy, though originally I had no intention of writing Path of Honor
and Path of Blood. I’m pretty content to leave them, though there are a
couple of characters I’d like to go back and write about. Maybe in
short story form. Soka for one. Juhrnus for another. Their stories
seem more unfinished. As for middle-book syndrome—I’m still not
convinced Path of Honor doesn’t suffer from it. It was a bear to
write—partly because it was a sophomore book, partly because it was a
middle book, and partly for the personal stuff going on in my life. It
took longer than I wanted and required more extensive rewrites. Plus I
had a new editor for it and this was the first book she found on her
desk when she arrived. So it took us some time to sort out our visions
and ideas. I worked hard to arrive at a satisfying ending—even though
it still seems more like a pause in the storyline to me. So I’m really
glad to hear that you don’t think it suffers from middle-book syndrome.
A lot of what that book was about for me was that I intentionally had
everything in Path of Fate end with this huge hopeful happily-ever-after
feeling with the big crescendo of orchestral music as she rides off into
the sunrise of a new day. I did that because I knew that in Path of
Honor, I planned to explode it. There’s no way this newly powerful
person could show up and not be scary as hell to all the powers that be,
and she couldn’t miraculously solve all their problems (even if they
could agree on their problems) and then on top of that, she might be
incredibly powerful, but she’s clueless about what she’s doing, which
means she screws up a lot. I really wanted to explore what would really
happen in that situation versus the romantic fairytale ending.
I don’t expect to run into middle book
syndrome in the Crosspointe books, because they are, at least at this
point, all stand alones. The broader political and cultural issues
continue to wax and wane, but the individual stories are hopefully
resolved in each book. Now that could change if I decided there was a
story that needed more room to be told, or if I wanted to pursue a
sequel to any. And of course, if my editor was remotely interested.
Vision:
I said above your characters are vivid. Some writers seem to have
characters that all share the same point of view, or at least seem to be
pulling in the same direction. You've created a lead character in the
Path series that certainly stands out. She's headstrong, and acts on her
convictions – yet inside tends to doubt and wonder. As such, she's very
convincing, and very real. How did you do that? And how do you avoid the
similarity existing in the rest of your surrounding characters? What
tips or tricks do you use to prevent her character from permeating into
the other supporting characters?
Something else that’s good to hear.
Thank you. It’s a constant concern for most writers—how to
differentiate the voices of their characters? For me, I get to know
them really well and try to think of exactly how they would speak, the
kinds of words they would and wouldn’t use, what motivates them, what
they fear, and so on. When you look around at real people, they are
incredibly individual and what makes them so are their unique
sensibilities and minds. So I try to find those for my characters.
As for tips and tricks—I’ve used
catchphrases, specialized dialects, a certain kind of attitude, physical
signatures, and so on. But I think the most important thing is to truly
know your characters inside and out. For instance, in The Cipher, which
is coming out this fall, my character is Lucy. She starts out as one of
those tactful sort of people who tend to not be blunt or not to speak
their minds because she wants to be polite. However all that changes
for her. She no longer has time to waste on the niceties and no
inclination to spare feelings. So she becomes blunt and it’s very
freeing for her. I think her voice is one of the best I’ve ever
written. At least she amuses me to no end. To give you some idea of
her voice, here’s the first line of the book: “There were some days
that deserved to be be drowned at birth and everyone sent back to bed
with a hot brandy, a box of chocolates and a warm, energetic companion.
Today was without question one of those days.” She’s got opinions.
Vision:
Your books deal very realistically with the underdeveloped rural
outdoors and the difficulty of crossing large distances in a world where
horses are the fastest mode of transportation for overland
crossings. The travails of living off the land, the realistic depiction
of saddle sores and horse hooves makes one feel you've 'been there and
done that.' Is that true, or is this another example of meticulous
research? And if so, where would writers find those details that make it
all seem so real?
I grew up on a cattle
ranch in northern California, and I pretty much lived on horseback. So
that’s where a lot of the horsey stuff comes from. I did a very small
bit of endurance riding, but it was enough to teach me that going 25
miles on horseback through the mountains is extremely hard. I’ve had
saddle sores (I occasionally would ride in shorts), though to be honest,
I rarely used a saddle. I rode almost entirely bareback. I think it
would not be far off the mark to say that my childhood was entirely
devoted to horses and books.
The living off the land stuff comes
more from living in Montana. I live in an incredibly rural area, which
pretty much describes all of Montana. I live in high mountain desert,
and my county is the same size as Delaware and Rhode Island put
together, but with a population of only 9,000 people. There’s a lot of
open country here, and a lot of wildlife. I see antelope, elk, deer,
and moose every day. Hunting is a way of life here—people winter off
what they hunt. Many of them cut up and process the meat themselves (my
husband does). The only time I eat beef is when I go to a restaurant,
though I occasionally buy chicken and pork. But mostly we live off
venison. Course it’s really heart healthy, but that’s another story.
So yeah, a lot of what I know about
living off the land comes from being here and living in a world where
that’s what a lot of people do. It makes it easy to ask just about
anybody a how-to question and get an answer. But I’m also an avid
reader and observer. So for instance, the log jam in Path of Fate comes
from watching logs coming down a river in Oregon and getting jammed up.
I read survival guides—did you know that bat guano is explosive? That
if you build a fire in a cave where there is bat guano, it’s going to be
a serious problem? I remember reading David Quammen’s essay
“Strawberries Under Ice” and that, in combination with some of my
survival reading, gave me the idea about taking shelter under a
traveller pine—though they are called traveller pines for just that
reason; they were used for shelter. They had a thick bed of accumulated
needles underneath for warmth and for comfort, and the snow and rain
really doesn’t penetrate underneath.
I also have a close friend in Oregon
who oozes this kind of information. We go camping together and she
talks about lighting fires without matches and what various plants are
used for. That helped me to create the natural world, and also give me
a foundation for understanding the ecology of a place. I also did a lot
of research on plants and their uses for Reisil, since she’s a healer
and has to know these things. But this was also useful information to
have for establishing the natural world. Now lately on the Discover
Channel has been a show—and I’m totally forgetting the name of it right
now—where they drop a guy into inhospitable surroundings and he has to
stay alive and find a way to safety. That show can tell you a lot about
survival—from making fire to building shelter to finding food and water
. . . . It’s pretty phenomenal information. I wish I’d had it when
writing the Path books, but I’m filing away information for later use.
I guess the main advice I’d have for
writers who are researching something they don’t necessarily know
something about is to do it thoroughly. Really understand your
subject. You’ll ending up knowing tons more than what actually makes
the book, but those little details you include will make a world of
difference in creating a world and characters that have depth. Here’s a
for instance. I’ve been working on a book called The Black Ship. It’s
the second in the Crosspointe books. It’s set mostly on a square-rigged
clipper ship. Here’s the problem: I don’t sail. I don’t know anything
about sailing or ocean currents or tides. Or at least, I didn’t.
But the first thing I did was dig for a
lot of different books. Some were on modern day sailing, many were on
square-rigger sailing. Some were written by sailors of the 18th
and 19th centuries. I read fiction (Patrick O’Brien anyone?)
and non-fiction accounts of sailing. I bought dictionaries of sea words
and I scoured the internet for more info. I found a group on MySpace
who are squarerigger sailors. I found a guy who currently captain’s a
squarerigger ship. I looked up a squarerigger ship (the Lady
Washington) and sailed on her—it was a short sail, but I learned a lot
about the workings of the sails.
My point is that I researched. I still
feel I could and should know a lot more, but I’ve been able to use the
language and create scenes that I think are accurate and that my readers
won’t be jolted out of the reality of the story. For the Path books, I
stopped to research a lot. Every small thing I didn’t know about, I
went and looked up, asked about, drew from my notes, and so on.
Vision:
Your website lists you as an author of
high fantasy adventure. Can you tell us what that means to a story?
That was something that my webdesigner
came up with after reading my books. I thought it fit pretty well.
High fantasy, to me, refers to fantasy that is set in a
pre-technological setting, focuses at least some on the nobility or
leadership of a land or lands, the stakes are high (and concern a larger
group of people or world), and includes magic-wielders of some sort, or
that magic is integral to the world. The adventure part is simply
that—action and adventure, versus a sort of interior struggle, though
hopefully I include both elements. Otherwise the characters wouldn’t be
very interesting. The Crosspointe books fall into this category fairly
well, also, I think.
Vision:
You have a short story (All Things Being Not Quite Equal) that you are
turning into a full length novel. How do you go about expanding a
shorter work into a longer one? How does your approach differ
when writing a short story rather than a novel?
This one has been hard. I published
the story more than 10 years ago now, I think. And there are things
about it I’d like to change, now that I’m doing a novel. But I feel I
ought to remain faithful to the original, so I’ve been struggling
against that. When I began to work on the novel, I decided to set it a
couple of months after the story ended. But I struggled with an opening
chapter. I ended up starting it eight or ten times, and finally came up
with an opening chapter. It was really hard because I knew I had to
include information that had been in the story, but I couldn’t retell
the story. After I got three chapters done, I realized that that first
chapter was really a second chapter, and had to write a whole new
opening. But now I think it works. Course it hasn’t sold yet, but I’m
keeping my fingers crossed. I really like it and enjoy writing it.
The short story was a pretty tight and
closed story line. But the novel is obviously going to be more complex,
with a lot more characters and more events. When I write short stories,
I pretty much have to know everything that’s going to happen before I
start. I don’t write them well unless I have an ending. Novels are a
little different. I try to map out the major events (and often those
change drastically as soon as I begin writing) and then I jump in. As
the characters develop and change and as new events happen that I didn’t
see coming, the story changes. It can be thoroughly uncomfortable not
knowing where things are going, but in a novel where I have time and
space to let things play out, I can live with that discomfort. But with
short stories, when it happens, I tend to freeze up until I mentally
sort things out, which is why I don’t write a lot of them.
Vision:
Besides high fantasy, what genres do you write in, and why? Would you
like to try your hand at any others?
I have been known to write the
occasional historical fantasy story. A lot of that grows from my
research from my PhD studies. And I write the occasional skewed vampire
story—one where things aren’t quite as expected. Like my ugly vampire
story. I’d like to try my hand more at an urban fantasy, perhaps
paranormal romance. If I ever get a good idea. I’ve discovered it’s a
lot of fun to be able to include pop-culture references, which you can’t
do in traditional fantasy. But don’t get me wrong, I love writing
traditional fantasy. It’s my primary love.
Vision:
Who has influenced your writing?
Pretty much everything
I’ve read. For the Crosspointe stuff, I think you can see a lot of
Dickensian influences. In Path of Honor, I think you can see
some Foucaultian influences. But really, everything I read provides
something fertile to help grow me as a writer, to help grow my
imagination.
Vision:
Your website,
www.dianapfrancis.com,
has a number of articles for new
writers. What drives you to want to help new and would-be authors?
It’s a pay it forward thing. When I
was starting out, I wrote letters to Marion Zimmer Bradley and Sheri
Tepper asking newbie questions and generally looking for encouragement
and a connection to women writers in sf/f. They very kindly wrote back
with advice (and I do mean wrote—this was a time before email was
prevalent). I really appreciated that. And then I was able to do a con
workshop at Wiscon with Nancy Kress who was amazing. I’m in a position
to offer the same sort of help and support to aspiring writers and I
want to as best I can.
Vision:
So, given all that - are there common mistakes you see new writers
making? What suggestions would you give them?
There are a couple common mistakes I
see regularly. One is having stories that aren’t finished—what I mean
by that is that a lot of new writers get so hung up on getting the early
chapters right that they never finish. Better to finish and then revise
once you actually know exactly what your story is about. Along with
that is the tendency to think that once you’ve written it, maybe revised
once or twice, that your book is ready. It may not be. It may need a
lot more work. You have to keep working at improving your craft. Heck,
I’ve got four books done and a fifth about to turn in, and I’m still
trying to figure out how to be a better writer. And then finally, I
think it’s important to keep writing. To not put all your faith in one
project. It may not sell. And the second one may not. But you keep
writing no matter what, keep revising, and eventually it’ll happen for
you. Plus I think you learn a lot from completing new projects, which
allows you to go back to earlier writing and see better where the
fractures and holes are.
Vision:
Do you see the Internet as a good tool for upcoming writers? How should
they be using it, if it is?
It’s a great tool for connecting to
readers, for spreading the word about your work, and for getting
feedback. But you have to be careful. The world of publishing is very
set in its ways, and dare I say, old-fashioned. You can’t publish your
work online and expect publishers or agents to a) find it, or b) they
may not want it if its already been electronically published. Plus, a
lot of people will put their work up on their blog or on MySpace groups
or wherever with an expectation of criticism from whoever is out their
reading. But there are a couple of problems with that. First, many
don’t actually want criticism—they want validation. And it can be
soul-destroying when you don’t get it. Second, you have no idea whether
your readers will be skilled enough to give you quality feedback, or
even like the sort of thing that you write. You really need to know
something about them and be able to discuss their opinions before you
can decide.
Vision:
When did you know you wanted to be a writer?
I don’t think I ever did. It was just
something I did because I needed to. I sent out short stories because I
wanted to see if anyone would buy them, but the concept of Writer—I
still have a hard time thinking of myself as a writer. I keep wondering
if anybody’s actually reading my stuff and whether they know what a goob
I am, and if they did, would they keep reading?
Vision:
Has writing changed who you are or how you see the world? Are there
themes that matter most to you?
Unfortunately, writing has made me more
of a hermit. I have a day job and kids and the writing. I don’t
socialize or get out to events the way I used to. I think that’s
unfortunate. One of these days I hope to be able to find a schedule
that allows me to have more balance. Sometimes I think I must be the
most uninteresting person in the world for being locked up in my office
so much.
As far as themes go—I’m fascinated with
heroes. With people who sacrifice and people who ignore other people’s
suffering. I’m interested in the way cultures clash—the way that each
side believes itself to be so very good, and yet often the results are
so very bad. Everything is shades of gray to me anymore. There’s very
little that’s black and white. Okay, pedophilia, rape, child abuse—in
my book those crimes pretty much mean you should have your throat cut.
Those are black and white. But so much else is not.
Vision:
Let's get to the crux of writing. What started you on this career path?
Has your career progressed the way you thought it would?
It feels a lot like luck got me
started. Or animal instinct. It just was what I needed to do. Ever
since I was a kid, I told epic stories and acted them out. I grew up on
a cattle ranch and had a lot of open space and alone-time to do that
(though I frequently involved my friends). I was a daydreamer and I’d
spin these convoluted adventures to entertain myself and my friends.
It’s a wonder I ever heard anything in school. I got very lucky with my
first books—in that the first publisher I submitted to bought them. And
they also loved my Crosspointe idea. So all that has been shockingly
wonderful.
But I never did very well selling
stories. I thought that I’d never sell a book, considering my short
story track record, so that was all the more astonishing. And I don’t
make a living wage doing this by any means. I wish that were different,
but I hope to one day.
Vision:
For the record, are you a full time writer, meaning you are able to
support yourself solely on writing? If so, how long did that take? And
is it a reasonable goal for a new writer to aspire to?
No, I’m not. And I don’t think it’s a
reasonable goal, at least not in the short term. Yes, it’s possible to
make enough money to support yourself, but many, if not most, sf/f
writers do not. And many who do, struggle with paying insurance and
have a spouse or partner who also works a more stable job to make sure
the regular bills are covered. It takes a long time to build a career
and the vagaries of the publishing world can be very difficult. But
that doesn’t mean you shouldn’t strive for it. It just may take awhile
longer than you expect or want.
Vision:
What is your average day like? Do you write every day?
I try to write every day. I teach at a
University and we are on the block sysem. That means that every student
takes one class at a time, for three and a half weeks, for three hours a
day. As a teacher, it is an exhausting way to teach and makes it very
difficult for me to sustain a regular writing schedule. I try to get in
a lot of extra hours on weekends. I do not teach in the summers, and so
I spend long hours writing then. I tend to be a get-up-late and
go-to-bed late sort of writer, though lately I’ve been more distracted
at night than I like and am thinking to switching to an early morning
schedule to see if it helps.
Vision:
Any things you can recommend to would be writers that you think could
help them move forward in their careers? Are there skills you should
have sharpened, habits you wish you would have developed? Did you have
any special background or training that helped you?
They’ve probably heard
this before, but the two things they have to do is read and write.
Reading teaches you so much about writing, stuff that just clings to you
by osmosis. It teaches you about story-telling, about history, about
developing characters and every nuance of writing. And I don’t mean
just read what you write. Read everything, a wide spectrum of things.
The other thing is that writers write. That means put your butt in the
chair and stay there until you’ve written. No matter how bad you think
it is. I have a sign on my computer that says “Abandon All Standards
and Write Fast.” For me, that means get the draft down and then go back
and revise. Don’t let that internal beastie editor keep telling you
that everything you’re writing is crap. Don’t let it get in your way.
I didn’t develop
discipline as a writer until I was working on my dissertation in
college. Now I write every day. Okay, that’s not true. There are days
when I can’t, but I write at least five days out of a week. And usually
more. Even for a few minutes.
As for special
background—I have an MA in creative writing. That taught me a lot about
how to look at my own work critically, and let other people do it,
without getting upset and angry. Writers have to have thick skins. But
we often don’t. But remember, your work isn’t your baby—it’s your art,
and you have to be willing to manipulate and change it if you want to
improve.
Vision:
Any "if I'd known then what I know now" thoughts? Are there things you
could have done that would have made it easier for you to reach this
point in your career?
I wish I’d stuck with some of my
vampire stuff. It’s become very popular now and the market is
saturated. But I still have a story I want to tell. If only I’d done
it about ten years ago . . .
But other than that, I don’t think
there’s a magic key or a magic path. It’s slogging away, it’s
persevering, and it’s never giving up. And it’s doing the writing.
Don’t think about it, wish you had time for it, or plan to start
tomorrow. You have to write. Now. Make it a priority. It’s hard
because you don’t know if it will ever pay off—will you ever get
published? And a lot of people around you will see it as a hobby
(luckily my husband has always been a huge supporter of mine). But you
have to say no—the writing is a priority and it’s valuable and
important.
Vision:
What do you have coming out that we should look for? What sort of things
do you plan, or hope, to write in the future?
In November is when the
first of the Crosspointe Chronicles will hit the shelves. It’s titled
The Cipher. It’s set on an island in the middle of a very strange,
magical sea, and the story revolves around blackmail, political intrigue
and betrayal. In it, Lucy Trenton is a custom’s official who finds
herself in a whole lot of trouble and the only person she can trust
cannot be trusted at all.
As for planning and hoping . . . . I’d
like to be able to continue to write in the Crosspointe world for
awhile. It’s really unusual and there’s a lot of stories to be told.
I’d also like to sell my ugly vampire novel. And as I said, I’d like to
play a little more with contemporary or urban fantasy—if I can think of
a good story. Maybe one day I’ll sell enough books to be a full-time
writer.
Vision:
Thank you for taking this time for this interview. Any last words you'd
like to say to our readers?
Just that breaking into publishing is
difficult and heartbreaking—but it can be done. Really. It can be
done.
For more information, be sure to visit
the Diana Pharaoh Francis website:
www.dianapfrancis.com
|